Monthly Archives: September 2011

Webster-Stratton Parenting Course, Part 2

Things I managed to find out about what happened after I left last week:

The group were given handouts – an information sheet on the benefits of play, a sheet of 'refrigerator notes' giving tips on how to play with your child (follow your child's lead, pace at your child's level, praise and encourage your child's ideas, etc.), a questionnaire about our current parenting situation, and the homework for the week (which was meant to be not just playing with our children every day, but also recording this on the Record Sheet and reading the handouts and Chapter One from the Incredible Years book).  They weren't, alas, given the Incredible Years book, which rather scuppered that last.

They watched three of the promised six vignettes, which turned out to be DVDs of different parenting scenarios.

They spent half an hour trying to figure out how to open the DVD section on the centre's TV, before realising someone had taped it shut.


That's about it.  The group leader had to go to a meeting, so we had a different group leader for this session, so she couldn't fill me in on all that much.  Oh, and we have a fifth group member (make that a sixth group member – I thought the other staff member who was there was there as a deputy leader, but in fact I think she's actually there under her parent hat, so to speak).

This week was the second on three planned sessions about play.  We discussed ways in which play helps our children to learn, and watched the DVD vignettes that the group didn't watch last week (on not rushing children during play and not being too directive) and then some more for this week, on giving children attention. Then we did a role-play in which the mother (me) was meant to be focusing on giving attention only to the well-behaved child (another group member) while ignoring the child who was misbehaving (a third group member).  The idea, apparently, was to get us thinking about how it felt to be the child who was being ignored.  I don't know that this was hugely useful (except to the mother playing the role of the misbehaving child, who said she found it delightfully therapeutic to get to be the naughty one for once), but it did feel quite restful to be dealing with a 'child' whose idea of misbehaving was to bang some toys together rather than to launch full tilt with flying fists into the other child, screaming "NOOOOOO!  YOU ARE BEING VERY SILLY!  NOW YOU ARE NEVER ALLOWED TO PLAY WITH THE BLOCKS AGAIN!"

The homework was almost the same as for the first week, except that this time the daily play periods were meant to be specifically on some type of learning activity (painting, Playdoh, dressing up, building with blocks, etc.), and we were given the option of listening to Chapter One of Incredible Years on audiotape instead of reading it (just as much a non-starter, since we don't have audiotapes either – however Helen is, apparently, trying to get hold of some copies of the books, so we might have them by next session).  Stay tuned.


1 Comment

Filed under (Horses for) Courses

Webster-Stratton, Part 1

I have started a parenting course: the Webster-Stratton Incredible Years Parenting Course, to be precise.  As with the NCT classes four years ago, this is not so much because I feel any great need to learn about the subject matter (reading parenting books and discussing parenting issues on Internet lists qualify, by this point in my life, as my hobbies), but because I think it sounds like a fun way of meeting people.  After all these years of discussing parenting on the 'Net, I figured it would be good to get to do it with face-to-face, with people with whom I could potentially get together for a coffee later.  I was a bit dubious about the appropriateness of taking a place on a parenting course on that basis – what if I thereby deprived a woman who really did want to learn more about parenting skills of a place? – but, although I wasn't quite that blunt about my reasons when I spoke to the person running the course about starting, I did say I'd become interested because I thought it would be good to meet other parents and talk about parenting, and she didn't seem to think it would be any sort of an issue.  As it turned out, there are only four of us in the group anyway, so I think it fair to say that my presence there is not preventing anyone else who wants to from squeezing in.

Anyway, when I googled the course to find out more about it, I found a lot of links advertising courses in different parts of the world, but none from anyone giving the inside scoop on what it was like to attend (other than the obligatory glowing quotes about how helpful it had been).  I thought it might therefore be interesting to report back on what we learned each week, for the benefit of anyone else who's googling it.  One problem with that which I hadn't anticipated is that there turned out to be a confidentiality rule about what gets discussed in the meetings – this seems perfectly reasonable to me, so I will refrain from giving any details about the women there or any specifics of any problems anyone else discusses.

I also ran into some practical hassles – I had to go to the butcher after dropping Katie off at nursery and before going to the first meeting, meaning I arrived ten minutes late, and then I had to leave an hour early to let the plumber in to fix our boiler at home.  So, unfortunately, what I can tell you about the first session is rather limited.  Here's what I did manage to get:

The class started with an outline of what we would cover that week (this is the first bit I missed, but I saw it when the class leader turned the page of the flipchart back over) and then went on to detailed introductions, in which we each in turn gave our names, our children's names and ages, a brief summary of the kinds of problems we had with them, and what we hoped to get out of the course.  As well as the four of us and Helen, the person leading the group, there was another staff member there; I haven't found out whether she's officially there as a second group leader or whether she's sitting in to learn more about the course for herself.  We then brainstormed ground rules for the group – confidentiality, respect for others, and so forth.  The leader then showed us a picture of a pyramid divided into levels to illustrate the ways in which the course would build up our knowledge, starting at the most fundamental level, which was 'Play'.  On that foundation, we will build up in subsequent weeks to discussing such issues as emotional coaching, communication, rewards, limit setting, and finally discipline (though blessed if I can figure out what would be left under that final heading that won't already have been covered under all the others – oh, well, we shall see).

Our task for this first week, Helen explained (we will, it appears, have one each week on which we report back the following week), will be to focus on playing with each child for ten minutes.  We start on this before addressing any specific behaviours we want to change, because giving children that chance for our undivided positive attention provides the foundation we need for changing anything.  Connection with our children is one of the most powerful tools we have in working constructively with them.

We had a bit of a discussion about the practicalities of this task (how to manage it when we have more than one child, or when the child wants to play with someone else instead of us), which wandered off a bit into some discussion of some of the problems another mother was having, and then we went on to brainstorming about the benefits of play, such as connection with the child and fostering imagination.  And then, I had to leave to let the plumber in.  From what I saw on the flipchart, the rest of the group then went on to discussing barriers to play, followed by six vignettes.  Oh, well – maybe I'll get updated on that when I go back this Friday.  Meanwhile, the boiler is now working perfectly well after having the filters cleaned, and the butcher is now back to working on Saturday mornings as well after his holiday, so I should be able to make the full sessions for subsequent weeks.  Here's hoping.

Leave a comment

Filed under (Horses for) Courses, My (anti)social life

Je ne regrette beaucoup

Britmums have started giving out weekly prompts for blog posts, of which the first is 'If I could start my blog over, I would…', with invitation to talk about what we regret not coming up with in terms of names, headers, designs, whatever.  This provides me with the perfect opportunity to vent one of life's minor annoyances: the fact that the perfect title for a mummy blog occurred to me only several months after I had committed myself to this particular name/URL.  The Mummy's Curse.  There you are – wouldn't that have been more eye-catching than the one I actually thought of?

Beyond that, I have no regrets and am a bit bemused by the thought of having any.  Although the blog URL is irrevocably set unless I actually abandon this one and opt for a different one elsewhere (which I could do, but am not sure I want to leave a blog that's served me so well), everything else about blogging, unlike other life decisions, is open to change.  If I ever did wake up one day thinking "Oh, no – why did I not opt for a jazzy red-and-blue design for my blog header?" it would probably take me all of five minutes to change the settings accordingly. 

This does, however, seem like a handy moment to consider a suggestion my sister made.  Although this is theoretically a general blog, in practice nearly all my posts fall into one of two categories – Cute Anecdotes About Children, or Deconstruction Of Pervasive Parenting Myths.  Although both of these fall quite reasonably under the umbrella of 'parenting blog', my sister suggested that perhaps I should start two separate blogs for these two separate and disparate strands of my thought processes.

I see the logic – there probably is a place for a blog that's purely about The Truth Behind Those Parenting Myths.  (Especially since the superb Mainstream Parenting blog, which fulfilled just such a role, now sadly appears to be defunct.)  I'm just not sure I have the kind of time available to post to it regularly – it's hard enough keeping up regular posting on a single blog, and the Truth Behind Parenting Myths posts take forever to research and write.  So I think practicalities preclude that one.  I call upon you for your input, dear readers – what do you think?


Filed under I think this line's mostly filler

Artistic temperament

There is a well-known psychological assessment for children that involves asking them to draw a house, a tree, and a person and analysing the results.  I have no idea how accurate this is (the only reason I've ever heard of it is my misspent childhood reading books of the 'My Heartwringing And Thought-Provoking Experience As A Teacher Of A Special Class' genre), but, when Katie demanded the other day that I come up with an idea for something for her to draw, I thought, what the hell, it's not as though I have any other ideas that I feel a burning need for my three-year-old to immortalise on paper, and said 'A house'. 

She started off with the conventional square, and I waited for her to add windows, doors, and a roof.  Instead, she filled it with a number of objects that she assured me were:

An oven with two sausages in

A ceiling

A ground floor

A slide ('in case I want to slide down the slide')


A racing car

Woody's feet (not, it appears, the Woody from Toy Story – further details as to who or what this Woody might be were unforthcoming)

Woody's legs.


Out of curiosity, I did then google for the House-Tree-Person test to see what all this meant.  It appears my child is off the scale for psychopathology.  Personally, I prefer to go with the conclusion 'delightfully creative'.


Filed under Here Be Offspring